Adam's Site #3
Poly-Ticks

Home

Dic-tion-ary | Cool Stories | Pictures | Funny Stuff | Poly-Ticks | Jesus Page! | About Me/Contact Me | War on Terror | Links | Movies by Me

Definition of Politics-

Poly = many

Ticks = blood-sucking parasites

so, therefore:

Politics = Many blood-sucking parasites

Shooting yourself in the head, not the foot, that's the subject of this evening's "Talking Points Memo."  A few days ago, we saw [Democratic Presidential Candidate] Howard Dean blow himself up.  And last night, another "Maalox moment," this time between Peter Jennings and [Democratic Presidential Candidate] Wesley Clark during the debate. 

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

PETER JENNINGS, ABC NEWS:  The other day you had a rally here.  And one of the men who stood up to endorse you was the controversial filmmaker Michael Moore.  You said you were delighted with him.  At one point, Mr. Moore said in front of you that President bush, he's saying he'd like to see a debate between you, the general, and President Bush, who he called a deserter.  Now that's a reckless charge not supported by the facts.  And I was curious to know why you didn't contradict him and whether or not you think it was -- would have been a better example of ethical behavior to have done so?

WESLEY CLARK (D), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE:  Well, I think Michael Moore has the right to say whatever he feels about this.  I don't know whether this is supported by the facts or not.  I've never looked at it.  I've seen this charge bandied about a lot.  But to me, it wasn't material.

This election is going to be about the future, Peter, and what we have to do is pull this country together.  And I'm delighted to have the support of a man like Michael Moore. 

JENNINGS:  Do you still feel comfortable with the fact that someone  should be standing up in your presence and calling the president of the United States a deserter?

CLARK:  To be honest with you, I did not look at the facts, Peter.  I -- you know, that's Michael Moore's opinion.  He's entitled to say that.  I've seen -- he's not the only person who's said that.  I have not followed up on those facts.  And frankly, it's not relevant to me and why I'm in this campaign. 

(END VIDEO CLIP)

Excellent questioning by Jennings.  So let me get this straight.  General Clark is happy that Michael Moore is on his team and feels he doesn't have the responsibility to check out Moore's defamatory charges.  Do we have this right, general?

"Talking Points" has been saying over and over that political people who align themselves with radicals and smear merchants will never succeed.  Michael Moore goes all over the world bashing the USA.  He mocks our government,  slanders politicians with whom he disagrees, and generally behaves in an offensive manner to many Americans.

Those who hate America love Michael Moore. That's all you need to know.  So if I'm President Bush, I run Clark's soundbite on Moore all day long. It was a tremendous gaffe for the general, as poll numbers are going down. His own team admits it.

Once again, "Talking Points" believes Americans are entitled to any political opinion they wish to hold, but to denigrate their country, use slanderous tactics, and provide the haters of America with ammunition is simply disgraceful. "Stuart Smalley," Michael Moore and others like them should be ashamed, and so should General Clark for buying into this terrible trend.  Once again, Peter Jennings, congratulations. 

And that's The Memo.

-Bill O'Reilly

My turn...

"Well, I think Michael Moore has the right to say whatever he feels about this.  I don't know whether this is supported by the facts or not.  I've never looked at it."

Easily, that's the quote that describes 90% of Moore's fans. (The other 10% are flat-out anti-Americans) They see some kind of "fact" in one of his movies such as "The U.S. gave money and weapons to Osama in the Soviet-Afghan war in the 70's", and completly take it for granted as the absloute truth, no matter how outrageous it may seem.

But, as you may know, the real truth on the matter is that it's completly untrue. While the U.S. did give help to Afghans fighting that war, bin Laden was a Saudi who was only helped by the Saudi governemt (and of course, at this time wasn't a terror mastermind).

There are also other things that Moore-on has said: That we restored a dictator to power in Kuwait after removing Saddam's forces in 1991 (he's actually a king limited by a constutuion and a parliment), that we removed a democratically-elected leader from power in Argentina and replaced him with the dictator Pinochet. In reality, it was a military coup with only covert American support, and the overthrown leader was a Communist leader who was pretty terrible and was seeking relations with other Communist countries.

But the most intresting thing here is that Moore-on has endorsed Wesley Clark for President. Wesely Clark. The guy who led the Balkans War. Anyone who has watched, out of their own free will or otherwise, "Bowling for Columbine" (which I give negative four stars) knows that Moore vehimently opposed that war. This guy is an insult to the film industry as a whole. There is one question left: can his hypocrisy or his lies be seen  "Moore" easily?

iraqparties.gif

"Fairly Balanced" Stats on Iraq:
 
-At least 60% of Iraqis say they are better of right now than under Saddam, 70% say they will be after a year.
 
-We've managed to find all but 13 of the top 55 most wanted Iraqis, but no WMDs. But we have found thousands of pieces of WMD-making/storing equpiment, that tested clean, that Saddam never told the inspectors about. This violated the Gulf War surrender terms as well as U.N. Resolution 1441. So we legally had the right to invade Iraq, since the surrender terms have been voided. Did we morally have the right? You decide.
 
--We also found long range missiles and plans to buy more from North Korea. This also violates the surrender terms and 1441.
 
-According to an AP report, around 4,000 civillians have been killed by both sides of the fighting.
 
-On the other hand, Saddam had over 300,000 civillians killed and shoved in mass graves. That means that the war will have to go on for 75 years to kill as many civillians as Saddam did in 30 (It might actually be more, since this year had 2 months of major combat operations).
 
-In the 80's we gave Saddam WMDs to fight Iran with, belevind Iraq was the enemy of our enemy and therefore our friend. Man, that was stupid.
 
-In his earlier days, Saddam was a supporter of the Nazi and Communist parties (really).
 
-The most outspoken anti-war nations also had the most money staked in Saddam's regime.
 
-Most of the world thinks we are "empire building"
 
-Iraq will be turned over to the new government in June 2004, and there will be free elections in 2005.

-Saddam has been captured, and most Iraqis are glad. Most Arabs, however are not.